The smart Trick of cannabis cafe oslo That No One is Discussing
The smart Trick of cannabis cafe oslo That No One is Discussing
Blog Article
En slik dom vil markere at offentlig panikk ikke lenger styrer, gi forfulgte grupperinger et effektivt rettsmiddel, og bli en hjørnestein for bygging av integritet i rettssystemet.
Mikalsen’s op-ed emphasizes that as extra international locations control cannabis to safeguard public overall health, Norway can no longer suppose its prohibition serves a legitimate goal. Rather, authorized legal rights needs to be decided, as well as establishment of a cannabis cafe in Oslo hinges within the Director of Public Prosecutions’ commitment to lawful protection.
En vellykket aksjon, mener Mikalsen. Det er bedre med et kontrollert salg av cannabis enn at ungdommer kontrollerte salget ved Akerselva, sier han.
Om staten avviser påstandene som fremgår av dokumentaren, vil forsvaret legge frem tre filmer til som bekrefter det samlede bildet. Vi kommer tilbake til dette, Guys påstandene om rettighetsbrudd er så godt dokumentert at instruks og retningslinjer tilsier at påtalemyndigheten stiller seg bak ARODs krav om at de ansvarlige for straff må vitne.
As MLK as soon as stated, "Our lives start to conclusion the day we grow to be silent about things that matter." Let's honor individuals that fought for our rights by speaking out versus injustice, by using a stand for what is right, and by refusing to stay silent. Let us go on the legacy of people that came right before us, and get the job done in the direction of a far more just and equitable world for all. #equityb4equality #cannabis #businessleadership
I den grad rettighetsjussen har blitt nedprioritert har ruspolitikken et issue med menneskerettighetene, og AROD har vist koblingen til tidligere tiders vilkårlige forfølgelse. Riksadvokaten har et lederansvar for å sikre lov og rett, og denne spørsmålslisten til Justisminister oppsummerer det konstitusjonelle terrenget forbundet med ruspolitikk.
– Det sender et sign om at norske borgere følger Europa og verden ellers, og ikke norske politikere, og begynner å bli klare for at vi skal diskutere om vi skal regulere dette markedet og ikke la kriminelle styre det, sier Mikalsen.
This means that the prosecuting authority acknowledges (one) the relationship between the drug plan plus the arbitrary persecution of the past, (two) the integrity from the lawful career – without a doubt the complete procedure – decrees an intensive review, and (three) which the Minister of Justice's response to issues determines the load of your Constitution and whether the Accountability Act applies.
The Key Minister's testimony is usually envisioned to shed light on a major systemic problem, and on this foundation the courtroom can determine the integrity with the political course of action.
Cafeen heter «Norske tilstander» og skal være en motsats til frasen «svenske tilstander», som har florert i mediene de siste årene.
Nonetheless, it's the responsibility with the courtroom to make clear whether the drug coverage is associated with the arbitrary persecution with the past, and if the prosecuting authority, the Ministry of Justice, or maybe the Key Minister's Business office oppose this kind of relationship, the witness box will explain whether or not the government’s objections have any advantage.
– Og dersom etterforskninga viser at det er andre som kan holdes strafferettslig ansvarlig for dette salget vil det vurderes, sier han.
Towards the extent that the administrative law is prioritised, drug policy has a problem with human legal rights, and AROD has proven the hyperlink concerning drug coverage along with the arbitrary persecution of the earlier. The Director of Community Prosecutions contains a leadership obligation for securing regulation and justice, which list of questions towards the Justice Minister reveals the constitutional dispute connected to drug policy.
Let’s Converse Language: Why It's Time to Retire the Phrase "Cannabis" Many people have employed the term "cannabis" without having knowing its deeply rooted background in racism and discrimination. The expression was popularized during the early twentieth century as A part of a political campaign aimed toward stigmatizing Mexican immigrants and their association with cannabis. This fueled anti-immigrant sentiment and played more info a role within the unjust criminalization of a plant that cultures the world over have employed for centuries.